In our previous episode, Torsten Bonde Christiansen said: > >> the construct where forward declared classes is possible. > > That's a separate language enhancement request, read > > http://www.freepascal.org/faq.var#extensionselect > Since this is already possible in objfpc mode (at least partially) is it > nessesary to mark > it as a bug?
Yes. A case where a check is missing doesn't automatically mean a feature has been implemented where that check is not needed. Overriding methods with declarations that don't match the original is a big thing. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
