On 2014-03-24 10:57, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Torsten Bonde Christiansen said:
Yes. A case where a check is missing doesn't automatically mean a
feature has been implemented where that check is not needed.
Overriding methods with declarations that don't match the original is
a big thing.
Crap... this means I have to redo some of my code. ;)
-Torsten.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
