On 05/26/2014 02:23 PM, Sven Barth wrote:

I don't see a need for this in the FCL yet. At least not until the dust that you are whirling up has settled down as FPC has a quite slow release cycle.


I absolutely agree.

Nonetheless I feel that (a decently multi-arch enabled version) of TEpikTimer does make sense in the FCL as a courtesy class (in fact TList is a "courtesy class" as well, as it does not support syntax candy but just is provided directly for the user to use). Especially as the multi-arch support of EpikTimer is really critical and it would be very helpful to know that this issue is managed by the fpc team.

Hence including it in the svn seems nice to me, especially regarding that I'd like to use it in a Lazarus enhancement.

-Michael
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Reply via email to