> On Feb 19, 2021, at 8:50 AM, Ryan Joseph <generic...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I just realized another potential problem. If we use the "default" keyword
> that means there could be multiple "defaults" unless we limit the property to
> 1 per class, which would kind of defeat the purpose of the feature (like the
> issue we had with helpers and made multi-helpers for).
Can you respond to this concern? It could be a deal breaker for the syntax.
Regards,
Ryan Joseph
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
