Previously Alexander Limi wrote: > Hi, > > This isn't strictly a framework team subject, but thought I'd give a > little heads-up on something Hanno and myself have been discussing: > > For Plone 3.1, I want to do a big translation push. Our goal is to get the > 40 languages that cover more than 99% of the world's online population as > complete as possible. > > However, Plone 3.0 ships with translation files that contain strings for > both 2.5 and 3.0. We did a major cleanup in 3.0, killing off a lot of > happytalk, and as a result, there's less fluff to translate. > > You probably see where I'm going with this, but: I'd like to ship 3.1 with > a set of .po files that do not contain the strings from Plone 2.5. Hanno > said it would take him "a couple of hours" to weed out the stuff that is > 2.5-specific, and agrees that it would be a good thing to do. > > It will make Plone easier to translate, and increase our participation and > success rate with the upcoming translation push. > > Comments?
Sounds fine to me. In general I'm favour of a policy where we have one set of translations per major Plone release (major being 3.x, 4.x, etc.). Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. _______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
