On Oct 29, 2008, at 8:51 AM, Raphael Ritz wrote:
Now on to the real work - the reviewing.How do we distribute that across the team?
since we didn't talk about it or made any changes, i'd say the same "rules" still apply: each PLIP should be reviewed in depth by at least two people. however, now that external reviewers are allowed to be brought in, i think those two people doesn't necessarily have to be team members — imho one would be enough, but at least one would/should also be required. as with 3.1 the other members will be required to vote — or explicitly abstain, which is to say everyone must give a statement in regards to every one of the PLIPs reviewed (on the respective PLIP pages! :)).
as for distributing the work, i'd suggest everyone voice their preferences and interests for reviewing PLIPs, and/or possibly finding external reviewers. we've got 13 accepted PLIPs, so there will need to be at least 26 reviews. therefore i think every team member should at least pick 5 or 6, imho. i, for one, would be interested in reviewing the following:
· #126: Link type should automatically redirect when accessed directly
· #234: Standardizing our use of INavigationRoot
· #239: Adapterise the Extensible Indexable Object Wrapper
· #240: Improve locking configurability
· #243: Replace workflow history viewlet with content history
viewlet
· #247: Automate ZCML Loading for Plone Plug-ins
cheers,
andi
--
zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
friedelstraße 31 - 12047 berlin - telefon +49 30 25563779
pgp key at http://zitc.de/pgp - http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net/
plone 3.1.6 released! -- http://plone.org/products/plone/
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
