> Why bring this up on the framework team list? The framework team is not
> a governing body.

Then, who is? I certainly think that if the framework team makes a
decision on this, it would be widely respected and supported.

I think that the PF Board would prefer not to make the decision, in
order to continue the tradition of the board not governing
development. And, I think the developer list is way too wide open.

Steve

On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Previously Calvin Hendryx-Parker wrote:
>> I just noticed that on the PSC the Plone 2.5.5 release is listed as
>> not supported.  I'd suggest that unless we have sent an email to the
>> announce list that the latest 2.5.x relases still be "supported".  I
>> also noticed that some of the older 3.1 releases are still listed as
>> supported.  Is there a reason that those aren't listed as unsupported
>> since there is a 3.1 that would supersede them?
>
> Why bring this up on the framework team list? The framework team is not
> a governing body.
>
> Wichert.
>
> --
> Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>    It is simple to make things.
> http://www.wiggy.net/                   It is hard to make things simple.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Framework-Team mailing list
> Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
> http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
>



-- 

Steve McMahon
Reid-McMahon, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team

Reply via email to