> Why bring this up on the framework team list? The framework team is not > a governing body.
Then, who is? I certainly think that if the framework team makes a decision on this, it would be widely respected and supported. I think that the PF Board would prefer not to make the decision, in order to continue the tradition of the board not governing development. And, I think the developer list is way too wide open. Steve On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Previously Calvin Hendryx-Parker wrote: >> I just noticed that on the PSC the Plone 2.5.5 release is listed as >> not supported. I'd suggest that unless we have sent an email to the >> announce list that the latest 2.5.x relases still be "supported". I >> also noticed that some of the older 3.1 releases are still listed as >> supported. Is there a reason that those aren't listed as unsupported >> since there is a 3.1 that would supersede them? > > Why bring this up on the framework team list? The framework team is not > a governing body. > > Wichert. > > -- > Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It is simple to make things. > http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. > > _______________________________________________ > Framework-Team mailing list > Framework-Team@lists.plone.org > http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team > -- Steve McMahon Reid-McMahon, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
