On Tue, 05 May 2009 13:26:37 -0700, Alec Mitchell
<ap...@columbia.edu> wrote:
If you want to pinpoint a release that broke expectations with regard
to compatibility, Plone 2.1 is a far better example.
Just to make sure history is represented correctly here — Alec is
absolutely right.
Plone 2.5 was a well-managed release, 2.1 was a disaster (from a release
management perspective). Luckily, we've had incredible release managers
and good processes from Alec going forward — and we're extremely fortunate
in that regard.
--
Alexander Limi · http://limi.net
_______________________________________________
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
