>Balsom rightly points out that in the museum world there is
a double standard “whereby experimental film-makers are treated with less
respect than ‘artists working in film’ – such as Tacita >Dean, Stan Douglas or
Matthew Buckingham – whose work is never subject to such transpositions.”  She 
goes on to say that “recent
exhibition practices have demonstrated the persistent

And what was it that put the work of these people into their vaunted status in 
the museum world? Gallery representation? Art school cred? Press manipulation 
(publicity stunts, etc.)? Is that what a filmmaker needs to do to be taken 
seriously? I guess that seems to mostly work for Hollywood.
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Reply via email to