>This really does seem a little too cynical. No one is suggesting any such >thing. I'm just trying to represent the work of someone who is already >well-known >and presumably taken seriously. And I guess what it takes is being clear >about one's expectations and sticking to it.
Yes, that was a dumb, cynical remark I made. But I do have a genuine question as to what were the circumstances that allowed those artists to achieve their special status in the art world presenting film in a gallery setting? I'm mainly familiar with Stan Douglas's work of the past decade which includes film & photography (which have sometimes been photos related to a film), so he's got the art school and artist from another field thing in his support but what of Tacita Dean? I havn't seen her work but from my quick study online (ok just wikipedia) she seems to be a filmmaker who happened to be associated with a group of traditional artists who got some notoriety in the late 80s. Clearly she's had a great career, but would the galleries have called if she didn't have famous friends?
_______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
