I have heard of this idea, using the Bolex as a contact printer. Not with these particular stocks. Rather like a rumor...
Bernd. > Am 03.12.2015 um 06:19 schrieb Dominic Angerame <dominic.anger...@gmail.com>: > > I think its a big mistake to attempt. There does not seem to be room for the > thickness of the stock and the Bolex has no registration pin to keep frames > steady. I would not like to damage my Bolex through bi-paking. > > Dominic > >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Francisco Torres <fjtorre...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> try this book- >> >> Techniques of Special Effects of Cinematography >> By Raymond Fielding >> >> https://www.google.com.pr/search?tbo=p&tbm=bks&q=isbn:1136055533 >> >> the nypl used to have it.... years ago. >> >> it cites this article--- >> >> '' bipacking with a bolex'', American Cinematographer, March 1964,p.140 >> Day,W. Percy >> >> 2015-12-01 7:44 GMT-04:00 Chris G <spy...@gmail.com>: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I was wondering if it was especially idiotic to bi-pack two acetate-base >>> stocks (in this case both Kodak Hi-Con) in a Bolex for mattes while running >>> it slowly with an animation motor. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Chris >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FrameWorks mailing list >>> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com >>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FrameWorks mailing list >> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com >> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > > _______________________________________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
_______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
