https://vimeo.com/290301242

Results from our workshop.   A few water marks, but for their first time in
the lab processing, to be cross processing and have these results its
pretty good, could have used a darker orange filter, but it was overcast
and we couldn't forfeit the light.


◅
*MONO NO AWARE*
501c3 Cinema Arts Non-Profit Organization est. 2007
| Film Stock | Equipment | Lab Facilities | Workshops |
a: 33 Flatbush Avenue, Brooklyn New York
<https://www.google.com/maps/dir//33+Flatbush+Ave,+Brooklyn,+NY+11217/@40.6877184,-73.9819882,17z/data=!4m17!1m7!3m6!1s0x89c25bb25464b153:0x663d26fd9a518085!2s33+Flatbush+Ave,+Brooklyn,+NY+11217!3b1!8m2!3d40.6877184!4d-73.9797995!4m8!1m0!1m5!1m1!1s0x89c25bb25464b153:0x663d26fd9a518085!2m2!1d-73.9797995!2d40.6877184!3e2>
e: mononoawarefilm.com c: +1 2674561143 <%2B1%20267%20456-1143> in:gram
<https://www.instagram.com/mononoawarefilm/>
<%2B1%20267%20456-1143>
press: New York Times
<https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/11/nyregion/a-brooklyn-film-school-where-the-digital-revolution-didnt-happen.html>,
ViceTV
<https://video.vice.com/en_us/video/the-brooklyn-film-organization-bringing-analog-back-to-the-masses/584f0f243d8095724ccdaf1e>,
The Brooklyn Rail
<https://brooklynrail.org/2018/11/film/Mixed-Use-MONO-NO-AWARE>


On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 12:13 PM Anna Kipervaser <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I am often shooting on 3383; I use an 85 filter (orange to compensate for
> lack of orange base in the stock and to get near true color) and rate 3383
> at 3. Then I process in Tetenal E6 in a lomo reel/tank. Recipe below.
>
> FD: 100 degrees F, 2:45min
> H2O: 5min, warm, not warmer than 100 degrees F
> CD: 100 degrees F, 6min
> H2O: 5min, warm, not warmer than 100 degrees F
> BLIX: 100 degrees F, 6min
> H2O: 10min, cool.
> Stabilizer out of tank: 30sec
> Shake reel
> Hang film to dry
>
> Also, Mono No Aware has had successful results with C41.
>
> Always,
>  Anna
>
>
>
> ---
> anna kipervaser
> 847.571.6943
>
> annakipervaser.com
> yellowfilmlab.com
> onlookfilms.com
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 9:03 AM <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Send FrameWorks mailing list submissions to
>>         [email protected]
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>         https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>         [email protected]
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>         [email protected]
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of FrameWorks digest..."
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>    1. Re: Barbara Hammer, RIP (Dominic Angerame)
>>    2. tips for shooting on print stock? (trevor adams)
>>    3. Re: tips for shooting on print stock? (Scott Dorsey)
>>    4. Re: tips for shooting on print stock? (Nicole Baker)
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Dominic Angerame <[email protected]>
>> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected]>
>> Cc:
>> Bcc:
>> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 09:23:19 -0400
>> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Barbara Hammer, RIP
>> I am so sorry to hear this. I worked with Barbara for many years while at
>> Canyon Cinema and always admired her courage, strength and commitment to
>> avant- cinema and women filmmakers around the world.
>>
>> Her dynamic energy is certainly a loss to the community.
>>
>> Dominic Angerame
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Mar 17, 2019, at 10:54 PM, Ruth Hayes <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I just want to acknowledge Barbara Hammer’s passing, her influence on so
>> many experimental filmmakers, including myself, and her courage,
>> playfulness and indomitable spirit.
>>
>> Peace,
>>
>> Ruth Hayes
>>
>> http://www.randommotion.com
>>
>> blogs.evergreen.edu/hayesr
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FrameWorks mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: trevor adams <[email protected]>
>> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected]>
>> Cc:
>> Bcc:
>> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:20:12 +0000
>> Subject: [Frameworks] tips for shooting on print stock?
>> Hiya one'n all,
>>
>> I'm seeking any advice/ tips for shooting on 3383 color vision print
>> stock, with a bolex.  Everybody I've spoken to says use an ASA of 5, I'm
>> not sure if i should even take light readings?  Anything would be
>> helpful...
>> Thanks,
>> Trevor Adams
>>
>> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Scott Dorsey <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Cc:
>> Bcc:
>> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 14:25:49 -0400
>> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] tips for shooting on print stock?
>> 5 seems optimistic.  Shoot a test.
>> --scott
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Nicole Baker <[email protected]>
>> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected]>
>> Cc:
>> Bcc:
>> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:12:57 -0700
>> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] tips for shooting on print stock?
>> I haven't tried print stock, but have played with film I made myself
>> (handmade emulsion applied to clear leader) and that is also rated at a 5
>> (if that).  I would still absolutely take light readings, especially if
>> you're pointing at the light source, you might be surprised how much light
>> it throws off.  Maybe try spot metering instead of ambient.  I find that
>> helps me "see" the scene the way the film might.
>> Post your results!  I'd love to see them.
>>
>> Nicole Elaine Baker
>> MFA in Visual Studies, 2019
>> Pacific Northwest College of Art
>> Hallie Ford School of Graduate Studies
>> *www.magiklantern.com <http://www.magiklantern.com>*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 9:20 AM trevor adams <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hiya one'n all,
>>>
>>> I'm seeking any advice/ tips for shooting on 3383 color vision print
>>> stock, with a bolex.  Everybody I've spoken to says use an ASA of 5, I'm
>>> not sure if i should even take light readings?  Anything would be
>>> helpful...
>>> Thanks,
>>> Trevor Adams
>>>
>>> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> FrameWorks mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FrameWorks mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Reply via email to