Sorry to co-opt this thread, but Nicole at what stage do you remove the remjet? As a last step? Or pre-bath? Any recs for baking-soda to water ratio? Thanks!
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 3:53 PM Nicole Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > The removing the remjet (the backing you speak of) has been greatly > exaggerated in terms of how hard it is. I use a warm baking soda bath and a > quick wipe down with a damp microfiber cloth. Not a speck remains. > Theres some great tutorials on YouTube to employ a variety of removal > methods, if anyone is interested. > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019, 9:07 AM trevor adams <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Mr. Antos is correct, sir. It's less than half the going rate of >> reversal. Also, this particular stock doesn't have the backing which makes >> hand-processing arduous (as it's been explained to me). And ignorance is >> about the most cultivated quality in my work! >> Trevor Adams >> sinemodafatestare.com >> >> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* FrameWorks <[email protected]> on behalf of >> Julian Antos <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Thursday, March 21, 2019 12:14 AM >> *To:* Experimental Film Discussion List >> *Subject:* Re: [Frameworks] tips for shooting on print stock? >> >> I think the appeal is that it’s much cheaper! >> >> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:11 PM Francisco Torres <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> pardon my ignorance but I have never understood the use of print stock >> as camera original. Would using reversal accomplish similar results? >> >> 2019-03-20 12:20 GMT-04:00, MONO NO AWARE <[email protected]>: >> > https://vimeo.com/290301242 >> > >> > Results from our workshop. A few water marks, but for their first >> time in >> > the lab processing, to be cross processing and have these results its >> > pretty good, could have used a darker orange filter, but it was overcast >> > and we couldn't forfeit the light. >> > >> > >> > ◅ >> > *MONO NO AWARE* >> > 501c3 Cinema Arts Non-Profit Organization est. 2007 >> > | Film Stock | Equipment | Lab Facilities | Workshops | >> > a: 33 Flatbush Avenue, Brooklyn New York >> > < >> https://www.google.com/maps/dir//33+Flatbush+Ave,+Brooklyn,+NY+11217/@40.6877184,-73.9819882,17z/data=!4m17!1m7!3m6!1s0x89c25bb25464b153:0x663d26fd9a518085!2s33+Flatbush+Ave,+Brooklyn,+NY+11217!3b1!8m2!3d40.6877184!4d-73.9797995!4m8!1m0!1m5!1m1!1s0x89c25bb25464b153:0x663d26fd9a518085!2m2!1d-73.9797995!2d40.6877184!3e2 >> > >> > e: mononoawarefilm.com c: +1 2674561143 <%2B1%20267%20456-1143> in:gram >> > <https://www.instagram.com/mononoawarefilm/> >> > <%2B1%20267%20456-1143> >> > press: New York Times >> > < >> https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/11/nyregion/a-brooklyn-film-school-where-the-digital-revolution-didnt-happen.html >> >, >> > ViceTV >> > < >> https://video.vice.com/en_us/video/the-brooklyn-film-organization-bringing-analog-back-to-the-masses/584f0f243d8095724ccdaf1e >> >, >> > The Brooklyn Rail >> > <https://brooklynrail.org/2018/11/film/Mixed-Use-MONO-NO-AWARE> >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 12:13 PM Anna Kipervaser >> > <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> I am often shooting on 3383; I use an 85 filter (orange to compensate >> for >> >> lack of orange base in the stock and to get near true color) and rate >> >> 3383 >> >> at 3. Then I process in Tetenal E6 in a lomo reel/tank. Recipe below. >> >> >> >> FD: 100 degrees F, 2:45min >> >> H2O: 5min, warm, not warmer than 100 degrees F >> >> CD: 100 degrees F, 6min >> >> H2O: 5min, warm, not warmer than 100 degrees F >> >> BLIX: 100 degrees F, 6min >> >> H2O: 10min, cool. >> >> Stabilizer out of tank: 30sec >> >> Shake reel >> >> Hang film to dry >> >> >> >> Also, Mono No Aware has had successful results with C41. >> >> >> >> Always, >> >> Anna >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --- >> >> anna kipervaser >> >> 847.571.6943 >> >> >> >> annakipervaser.com >> >> yellowfilmlab.com >> >> onlookfilms.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 9:03 AM < >> [email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Send FrameWorks mailing list submissions to >> >>> [email protected] >> >>> >> >>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> >>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >> >>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> >>> [email protected] >> >>> >> >>> You can reach the person managing the list at >> >>> [email protected] >> >>> >> >>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> >>> than "Re: Contents of FrameWorks digest..." >> >>> Today's Topics: >> >>> >> >>> 1. Re: Barbara Hammer, RIP (Dominic Angerame) >> >>> 2. tips for shooting on print stock? (trevor adams) >> >>> 3. Re: tips for shooting on print stock? (Scott Dorsey) >> >>> 4. Re: tips for shooting on print stock? (Nicole Baker) >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> >>> From: Dominic Angerame <[email protected]> >> >>> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected] >> > >> >>> Cc: >> >>> Bcc: >> >>> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 09:23:19 -0400 >> >>> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Barbara Hammer, RIP >> >>> I am so sorry to hear this. I worked with Barbara for many years while >> >>> at >> >>> Canyon Cinema and always admired her courage, strength and commitment >> to >> >>> avant- cinema and women filmmakers around the world. >> >>> >> >>> Her dynamic energy is certainly a loss to the community. >> >>> >> >>> Dominic Angerame >> >>> >> >>> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> >> >>> On Mar 17, 2019, at 10:54 PM, Ruth Hayes <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Hi all, >> >>> >> >>> I just want to acknowledge Barbara Hammer’s passing, her influence on >> so >> >>> many experimental filmmakers, including myself, and her courage, >> >>> playfulness and indomitable spirit. >> >>> >> >>> Peace, >> >>> >> >>> Ruth Hayes >> >>> >> >>> http://www.randommotion.com >> >>> >> >>> blogs.evergreen.edu/hayesr >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> FrameWorks mailing list >> >>> [email protected] >> >>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> >>> From: trevor adams <[email protected]> >> >>> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected] >> > >> >>> Cc: >> >>> Bcc: >> >>> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:20:12 +0000 >> >>> Subject: [Frameworks] tips for shooting on print stock? >> >>> Hiya one'n all, >> >>> >> >>> I'm seeking any advice/ tips for shooting on 3383 color vision print >> >>> stock, with a bolex. Everybody I've spoken to says use an ASA of 5, >> I'm >> >>> not sure if i should even take light readings? Anything would be >> >>> helpful... >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> Trevor Adams >> >>> >> >>> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> >>> From: Scott Dorsey <[email protected]> >> >>> To: [email protected] >> >>> Cc: >> >>> Bcc: >> >>> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 14:25:49 -0400 >> >>> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] tips for shooting on print stock? >> >>> 5 seems optimistic. Shoot a test. >> >>> --scott >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> >>> From: Nicole Baker <[email protected]> >> >>> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected] >> > >> >>> Cc: >> >>> Bcc: >> >>> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:12:57 -0700 >> >>> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] tips for shooting on print stock? >> >>> I haven't tried print stock, but have played with film I made myself >> >>> (handmade emulsion applied to clear leader) and that is also rated at >> a >> >>> 5 >> >>> (if that). I would still absolutely take light readings, especially >> if >> >>> you're pointing at the light source, you might be surprised how much >> >>> light >> >>> it throws off. Maybe try spot metering instead of ambient. I find >> that >> >>> helps me "see" the scene the way the film might. >> >>> Post your results! I'd love to see them. >> >>> >> >>> Nicole Elaine Baker >> >>> MFA in Visual Studies, 2019 >> >>> Pacific Northwest College of Art >> >>> Hallie Ford School of Graduate Studies >> >>> *www.magiklantern.com <http://www.magiklantern.com>* >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 9:20 AM trevor adams <[email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Hiya one'n all, >> >>>> >> >>>> I'm seeking any advice/ tips for shooting on 3383 color vision print >> >>>> stock, with a bolex. Everybody I've spoken to says use an ASA of 5, >> >>>> I'm >> >>>> not sure if i should even take light readings? Anything would be >> >>>> helpful... >> >>>> Thanks, >> >>>> Trevor Adams >> >>>> >> >>>> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook> >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>> FrameWorks mailing list >> >>>> [email protected] >> >>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >> >>>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> FrameWorks mailing list >> >>> [email protected] >> >>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> FrameWorks mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >> >> >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> FrameWorks mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >> >> -- >> Julian Antos >> Chicago Film Society >> www.chicagofilmsociety.org <http://www.northwestchicagofilmsociety.org/> >> 773 827 8991 <(773)%20827-8991> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FrameWorks mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >> > _______________________________________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > -- Ben Balcom benbalcom.com microlightscinema.com [email protected] 414-902-0236
_______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list [email protected] https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
