I'd been talking on a forum with a Linux database guy,
and he mentioned that on the PostGres lists, people
would "love to use *BSD" but the locale support is limited.
Well, sure 'nough, `locale -a | wc -l` seems to be in the
mid-200s here, and his systems have over 550 locales.
I've probably not RTFM'ed enough, but I'm just looking
for a short answer. What does FreeBSD need to have
more locales*? I'm assuming the answer is, more people
in more locations willing to take the time to RTFM and
submit patches to $x team.....
Discussion? Linkage? Slaps to the head?
Kevin Kinsey
* and, of course, an obvious counter question: *does* FreeBSD
need to have more LOCALES?"
--
Unprovided with original learning, unformed in the habits of thinking,
unskilled in the arts of composition, I resolved to write a book.
-- Edward Gibbon
_______________________________________________
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
