On 4/4/06, Kevin Kinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd been talking on a forum with a Linux database guy, > and he mentioned that on the PostGres lists, people > would "love to use *BSD" but the locale support is limited. > > Well, sure 'nough, `locale -a | wc -l` seems to be in the > mid-200s here, and his systems have over 550 locales. > > I've probably not RTFM'ed enough, but I'm just looking > for a short answer. What does FreeBSD need to have > more locales*? I'm assuming the answer is, more people > in more locations willing to take the time to RTFM and > submit patches to $x team..... > > Discussion? Linkage? Slaps to the head? > > Kevin Kinsey > > > * and, of course, an obvious counter question: *does* FreeBSD > need to have more LOCALES?"
I would not think that it could hurt. But I tend to think that even spurious locales would be sexy to have. -- -- _______________________________________________ freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
