Benjamin Lutz wrote: > Why is it that C++ is not used for our programs? The C++ > compiler is in the base and built by default, and the OOP > paradigm is a nice one, that many programmers, especially the > younger ones (like me :) ) are probably more familiar with than > the tricks and techniques used in C to achieve good efficiency.
Efficiency is of prime importance in systems programming. The only language in which one can write more efficient programs than in C, is assembler, but it's not portable. If someone is writing something in C, then you can assume they are seeking efficiency over convenience. C is still the lingua franca of the programming world. You need to be proficient in it. Many of us don't need C++. It occupies the middle ground between C and higher-level languages. When I want high-level datatypes or user-defined types and polymorphism, I work in Lisp, where I am much more productive. I work in C when efficiency is the paramount concern, but even then, I would rather extend a Lisp implementation with new primitives in C only where necessary, and so avoid completely reinventing the wheel. Many C++ programmers have switched their allegiance to Java, in order to gain the benefits of garbage-collection and freedom from pointer manipulation without having to learn a new paradigm. I doubt anyone would object if you wrote anything, except kernel code, in C++, or even objective C, for that matter, as they are all supported by GCC. -- James Bailie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.jamesbailie.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
