This is the most retarded thing I heard in weeks.
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 07:28:29PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Gilles Chehade wrote: > > >Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >>> > >>>I doubt that'll be productive -- NetBSD, FreeBSD and OpenBSD have all > >>>different goals... > >> > >>Even at the kernel level? Look at device drivers and vendors as one > >>example ... companies like adaptec have to write *one* device driver, > >>for, what, 50+ distributions of linux ... for us, they need to write one > >>for FreeBSD, one for NetBSD, one for OpenBSD, and *now* one for > >>DragonflyBSD ... if we had *at least* a common API for that sort of > >>stuff, it might be asier to get support at the vendor level, no? > >> > > > >How would a common API provide more support from the vendor ? What does > >the API have to do with releasing documentation ? > > I'd rather have Adaptec provide a source code driver for their cards > directly, then have Scott Long have to fight with unavailability of > documentation itself ... if the driver works, what do we need > documentation for? > _______________________________________________ freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"