As David O'Brien wrote ...
> > "Another possibility, if you have the RAM, is to use the team(1)
> > program (it's in the ports) to buffer the data as it goes to the burner.
>
> Any reason not to use ``cdrecord -fs=64m'' (or some simular size)
Any reason to? I mean, I never had to go over the default cdrecord
uses. But I only have a 2x writer and I generally create an iso image
file first.
YMMV
--
| / o / / _ Arnhem, The Netherlands - Powered by FreeBSD -
|/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte WWW : http://www.tcja.nl http://www.freebsd.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
