> > > "Another possibility, if you have the RAM, is to use the team(1)
> > > program (it's in the ports) to buffer the data as it goes to the burner.
> >
> > Any reason not to use ``cdrecord -fs=64m'' (or some simular size)
>
> Any reason to? I mean, I never had to go over the default cdrecord uses.
Since the author was already suggesting the use of team(1) he obvisiously
wants a larger buffer. I was mearly asking if there was something about
team(1) better than ``cdrecord -fs=XX''.
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED] -or- [EMAIL PROTECTED])
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
