> > I am concerned about just shoving it out to ports, as that makes > > it rot even faster. > > > > I am still very concerned that our in base i9xx code is like 4 > > years old and everyone is told to go to kmod-next from ports > > as well. > > > > No, I do not have a solution, but I have not tried hard to find > > one. I am sure if we try hard to find one it can be done. > > drm-next is a port and it's what most everyone will be using going > forward. You're asking us to make a special case for a small vocal > group of i386 users. If i386 is sufficiently important, its user base > can support it.
Are you saying there is only one way forward? -- Rod Grimes rgri...@freebsd.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
