> Am 2024-01-10 22:49, schrieb Mark Millard:
>
> > I never use atime, always noatime, for UFS. That said, I'd never
> > propose
> > changing the long standing defaults for commands and calls. I'd avoid:
>
> [good points I fully agree on]
>
> There's one possibility which nobody talked about yet... changing the
> default to noatime at install time in fstab / zfs set.
Perhaps you should take a closer look at what bsdinstall does
when it creates a zfs install pool and boot environment, you
might just find that noatime is already set everywhere but
on /var/mail:
/usr/libexec/bsdinstall/zfsboot:: ${ZFSBOOT_POOL_CREATE_OPTIONS:=-O
compress=lz4 -O atime=off}
/usr/libexec/bsdinstall/zfsboot: /var/mail atime=on
>
> I fully agree to not violate POLA by changing the default to noatime in
> any FS. I always set noatime everywhere on systems I take care about, no
> exceptions (any user visible mail is handled via maildir/IMAP, not
> mbox). I haven't made up my mind if it would be a good idea to change
> bsdinstall to set noatime (after asking the user about it, and later
> maybe offer the possibility to use relatime in case it gets
> implemented). I think it is at least worthwile to discuss this
> possibility (including what the default setting of bsdinstall should be
> for this option).
Little late... iirc its been that way since day one of zfs support
in bsdinstall.
> --
> http://www.Leidinger.net alexan...@leidinger.net: PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF
> http://www.FreeBSD.org netch...@freebsd.org : PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF
--
Rod Grimes rgri...@freebsd.org
