sos> Thats because of the runtime attach/detach code in current, if the sos> channel HW is there, its attached so you can add a device later sos> with atacontrol without having to boot. In -stable the channel is sos> not attached if no devices are present at probe time. Thanks for your clear explanation, I just understand what and why. > If it's true that this machine has _actually_ two ata buses, I'll > try to change irq of fxp0 (hope BIOS menu helps me...) sos> It does, most ATA chips does not allow to disable only one of the sos> channels. Hmm, maybe this problem (fxp0 doesn't attach) comes from that the driver doesn't allow to use shared IRQ. Anybody knows why? is it by hardware itself? -- - Makoto `MAR' MATSUSHITA To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Problems with ata probing twice. Makoto MATSUSHITA
- Re: Problems with ata probing twice. Makoto MATSUSHITA
- Re: Problems with ata probing twice. Makoto MATSUSHITA
- Re: Problems with ata probing twice. Chris Dillon
- Re: Problems with ata probing twice. Mark Peek
- Re: Problems with ata probing twice. Makoto MATSUSHITA
- Re: Problems with ata probing twice. Søren Schmidt
- Re: Problems with ata probing twice. Makoto MATSUSHITA
- Re: Problems with ata probing twice. Søren Schmidt
- Re: Problems with ata probing twice. Makoto MATSUSHITA
- Re: Problems with ata probing twice. Makoto MATSUSHITA
- Re: Problems with ata probing twice. Mike Smith
- Re: Problems with ata probing twice. Warner Losh
- Re: Problems with ata probing twice. Mike Smith
- Re: Problems with ata probing twice. Warner Losh
- Re: Problems with ata probing twice. Peter Wemm
- Re: Problems with ata probing twice. Warner Losh
- Re: Problems with ata probing twice. Warner Losh