On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 03:32:14PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 04:27:27AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 04:01:53AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > Actually, this should only be required for old ports (older than some > > > > > date which I don't know off-hand). It might be easier to just rebuild > > > > > everything though. > > > > > > > > This would be OK, if the X11 package came from the FreeBSD source > > > > tree, instead of just as a binary on the CDROM (I hate that upgrading > > > > a box breaks things... it should *never* break things, as long as you > > > > don't tell it to remove old libraries). > > > > > > If you can't deal with having to recompile things over the -current > > > development cycle then don't run it. > > > > > > Uh, the issue was the upcoming 5.0 release, which will cause these > > same problems for people. > > > As Kris already mentioned in the unquoted part of his original email, > this does not affect RELENG_4 binaries. >
Yes, it can. See yesterday's thread "Revision 1.48 of stdio.h breaks 3rd party software." Luckily, Peter helps me find a work-around. -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
