On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:17:07AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:02:16PM -0700, Chad David wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 07:11:56PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 07:09:41PM -0700, Chad David wrote: > > > > Does anybody know if there is a good reason why libobjc is built with > > > > thr-single.c? As well, who is the current maintainer of Objective-C? > > > > > > Few of us have ObjC clue. Do you have a patch that makes things better > > > that you can explain to us? > > > > To start with I have a few changes to hash.h, objc-list.h and thr.h that > > allow my code to even compile (without warnings) with I have attached. > > I believe they are all pretty obvious, except for the change to > > compare_ptrs(), which I'm not totally sure about... > > Is there any reason you have not sent these changes to the > [EMAIL PROTECTED] list? It looks like you're making generic ObjC > chagnes, not FreeBSD specific ones.
No there is no reason, and yes the changes are generic. I don't really expect there to be many (if any) changes to libobjc that are not generic, so if gcc-patches is the place to go, that is where I'll go. In your experience, how long is the delay between gcc-patches accepting something and FreeBSD picking it up, ie. is it worth the effort? -- Chad David [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.FreeBSD.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISSci Inc. Calgary, Alberta Canada To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
