If it will get ALL of you to give it a rest, how about: per-rule logging limits logging limit raising logging limit resetting Which would all NOT affect the statistics? I am, yes, suggesting I will implement it. Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! _ __ | _ \._ \ |) | http://www.FreeBSD.org/ _ |___/___/___/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Joe Greco
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Joe Greco
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Joe Greco
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Joe Greco
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Achim Patzner
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Julian Elischer
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Henk van Oers
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Brian F. Feldman
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Brian F. Feldman
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Henk van Oers
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Brian F. Feldman
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Brian F. Feldman
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Nate Williams
- Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Brian F. Feldman