On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Bakul Shah wrote:
> Allow me add something to what the FAQ-Xt says.
>
> I find it more convenient to immediately call a non-static
> function as shown below (using a slightly modified example
> from the FAQ).
Just got out of the shower, where I was wondering why they didn't suggest
the same thing. I was going to experiment with this way, since it fit
more closely with the way I like to code C++ (I don't like to code C++,
you understand, so my C++ code is always straining to look like C).
Thanks, Bakul. This looks much better. Thanks, folks, for letting me
pull hackers away from FreeBSD for a minute, but let's not let it get out
of hand; we better stop before we strain other's patience.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chuck Robey | Interests include C programming, Electronics,
213 Lakeside Dr. Apt. T-1 | communications, and signal processing.
Greenbelt, MD 20770 | I run picnic.mat.net: FreeBSD-current(i386) and
(301) 220-2114 | jaunt.mat.net : FreeBSD-current(Alpha)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
