> > Then IPv6 support for jail should be very good thing, > > because extremely many IP addresses become available for > > a machine with IPv6. (which is not with IPv4) > > We have a number of machines with many thousands of IP addresses using > the patch in PR#12071. It isn't as general a solution as using a hash > table to lookup interface aliases (as in NetBSD or BSDI) but it is > much more easy to manage one alias per CIDR block than 254 aliases per > /24 (say). > > Tony. > -- > let it be dot at The patch is interesting and seems efficient, and same kind of fix for IPv6 might also work. But my point is that, on public internet environment where global IPv4 addr is necessary, there is another issue of actual IPv4 addr shortage, isn't it? Yoshinobu Inoue To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Should jail treat ip-... Ollivier Robert
- Re: Should jail treat ip-... H. Eckert
- Re: Should jail treat ip-... Ollivier Robert
- Re: Should jail treat ip-... Warner Losh
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? sthaug
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Jamie Bowden
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Yoshinobu Inoue
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Should jail treat ip-numb... Yoshinobu Inoue
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Yoshinobu Inoue
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Warner Losh
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Pierre Beyssac
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Yoshinobu Inoue
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Yoshinobu Inoue
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Yoshinobu Inoue
- Re: Should jail treat ip-numb... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Should jail treat ip-... Jeroen C. van Gelderen
- Re: Should jail treat ip-... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: Should jail treat ip-... Yoshinobu Inoue