On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 01:36:31PM -0500, Dennis wrote: [open source is irrelevant because none but but the authors can really fix things] [open source _means_ that it's never finished] [the existing commercial support sucks] Seems like a pretty pointless and content-free set of remarks to be making on the mailing lists of a successful open-source project. Particularly from someone who obviously _does_ use and support open source projects. Go on, what's your real point? -- Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, no... Marco van de Voort
- Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in... Kevin Stevens
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, no... Giorgos Keramidas
- Re: Is FreeBSD documented? W... Wes Peters
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, no... Narvi
- Dennis' inability to fix the ... Mike Smith
- Re: Dennis' inability to fix ... Narvi
- Re: Dennis' inability to fix ... Narvi
- Re: Dennis' inability to fix ... Dennis
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, no... W Gerald Hicks
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, no... Andrew Reilly
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, no... Zach Brown
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, no... Ian Mondragon
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, no... Lloyd Rennie
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, no... Dennis
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in... Harold Gutch
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in theo... W Gerald Hicks
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in theory..... Garance A Drosihn
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead ? Mike Bristow
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead ? Max Khon
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead ? Wes Peters