On Monday, 24 May 2010 at 21:17:01 +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:13:07PM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote: > >> Is the thinking that groff has only been in base to support manpages? >> If so, this project makes sense. But even so, some clarification of the >> intent is needed. > > The use of (g)roff for anything but man pages is practically > non-existent.
I wrote two books in it. It's good for typesetting. It's pretty much useless for man pages. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers. This message is digitally signed. See http://www.lemis.com/grog/email/signed-mail.php for more details. If your Microsoft MUA reports problems, please read http://tinyurl.com/broken-mua
pgpLO0jskKTbv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
