On 17 Nov 2012 21:00, "Michael Ross" <g...@ross.cx> wrote: > > On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 21:11:43 +0100, Ivan Klymenko <fi...@ukr.net> wrote: > >> В Sat, 17 Nov 2012 15:00:06 -0500 >> grarpamp <grarp...@gmail.com> пишет: >> >>> http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html >>> http://it.slashdot.org/story/12/11/17/143219/freebsd-project-discloses-security-breach-via-stolen-ssh-key >>> >>> This is not about this incident, but about why major opensource >>> projects need to be using a repository that has traceable, verifiable, >>> built-in cryptographic authentication. >>> > >> LOL And how will this help Linux? >> http://lwn.net/Articles/457142/ > > > In the first comment on the article you link to, you find this: > > http://www.linux.com/news/featured-blogs/171-jonathan-corbet/491001-the-cracking-of-kernelorg > > where the OPs view is susbstantiated.
Yes, but git doesn't work with our workflow. It's been discussed several times, and changing to a tool that doesn't work for us (and is GPL btw) is no good at all. Chris _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
