on 19/11/2012 15:08 Chris Rees said the following: > > On 19 Nov 2012 13:05, "Andriy Gapon" <a...@freebsd.org > <mailto:a...@freebsd.org>> > wrote: >> >> on 18/11/2012 16:17 Chris Rees said the following: >> > On 18 November 2012 14:04, Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org > <mailto:adr...@freebsd.org>> wrote: >> >> On 18 November 2012 02:48, Andriy Gapon <a...@freebsd.org > <mailto:a...@freebsd.org>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> What you describe is not a workflow issue, but a local development >> >>> environment(s) setup issue. >> >> >> >> Which is a workflow issue. >> >> >> >> I mean, we could bang heads on semantics for hours on end, or we can >> >> realise that git isn't a magic bullet for FreeBSD development. >> > >> > Also... did I mention git is GPL? >> >> Yes, you did, twice now. >> I do not see any relevance of Git license to FreeBSD's choice of SCM >> solution. >> But, of course, I am not: >> a) a zealot >> b) proposing Git (or Subversion, or Mercurial) to be bundled with a base >> system > > I'm disappointed that you choose to call me a zealot- this is a valid concern, > especially since we're trying to move away from GPL stuff. Whether it's in > base > or not, you'd still be forcing me to install it for development. Why are > people > so dismissive of this point?
a. I haven't called you a zealot b. You now _sound_ like a zealot if even just installing GPL-licensed software on your local/private machine sounds like a problem to you -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
