on 18/11/2012 10:15 Adrian Chadd said the following: > On 17 November 2012 23:31, Konstantin Belousov <kostik...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Git would work well with our workflow. It supports the centralized >> repository model, which the project employs right now. > > It may work with your workflow, but it doesn't work with mine. :-) > > Right now the source tree isn't very good at building drivers from a > full HEAD checkout on a -9 or -8 running system. > > The include paths end up pulling from the local sys/net directory, for > example, rather than falling through to the specified kernel build and > kernel source path. > > So at least for me, working almost exclusively in driver/stack land, I > can do sparse check out of only the bits that I'm working on. It lets > me get work done without having to run an up to date -HEAD (and keep > said install up to date.) I also do development on little old netbooks > with SSDs that would make it prohibitive to checkout multiple git > trees. No, using git on a USB/CF/etc card doesn't work very well > either I'm afraid. > > I'm sure there are other use cases.
What you describe is not a workflow issue, but a local development environment(s) setup issue. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
