Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> I'm curious about the other things though ... FreeBSD still seems
> to have the early 90's abstraction layer from Mach and the vnode
> cache doesn't seem to grow and shrink dynamically (which can be a
> big win for systems with lots of metadata activity).
>
> So while it's true that FreeBSD's VM balancing seems to be the
> best one out there, I'm not quite sure about the rest of the VM...
>
Many years ago Kirk was talking about merging the vm objects and the vnodes..
(they tend to come in pairs anyhow)
I still think it might be an idea worth investigating further.
kirk?
--
__--_|\ Julian Elischer
/ \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
( OZ ) World tour 2000-2001
---> X_.---._/
v
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
