Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That would meet my needs. Are you sure this is a better route than
> allowing a "limiting parent node" to be specified along with -A and -a?
> Seems to me that the latter would avoid introducing yet more options and
> the functionality I'm proposing seems intuitive to me and Peter at
> least. :-)
Maybe so, but I've always thought -A and -X were *counter*intuitive,
and the current behaviour of 'sysctl foo' where foo is the name of an
opaque variable is, to say the least, surprising. Adding the -x
option makes it slightly less so.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
