On 07 May 2001 18:51:22 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Yes it will, with -X. The interesting question is why there isn't an > option to make it display just one variable in hex, and why it doesn't > print a message when it omits printing an opaque variable. Do you think it'd be okay to allow an argument to -a and -A that specifies the sysctl node from which to descend? Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries Sheldon Hearn
- Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries Sheldon Hearn
- Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries Peter Pentchev
- Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB ent... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB... Peter Pentchev
- Re: sysctl(8) and opaque... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries Peter Pentchev
- Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries Sheldon Hearn
- Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries Dag-Erling Smorgrav