In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nate Williams write s: >> >> Caldera's License Agreement: >> >> >> >> http://www.tuhs.org/Archive/Caldera-license.pdf >> > >> >Thanks. However, this isn't as specific as I'd like it to be. It >> >implies that Net1/Net2 are now 'legal', but it doesn't give explicit >> >release of said source code. >> >> Well, I have never heard claims that BSD was tainted by any USL >> release besides 32V, so this is good enough for me to put my 1.X tree >> up without fearing ugly lawyers. > >Ahh, the advantages of being overseas, away from litigious lawyers. :)
No not really, I just can't imagine who would be paying the laywers now that Caldera has marched their standard on the OSS side. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
