On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Florent Thoumie wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Coleman Kane wrote:
On 2/15/07, Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting Olivier Warin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 14 Feb 2007
19:54:09 +0100):
This issue is not only related to portupgrade, pkg_add a new port
takes
far too long now... and make index each time I upgrade my ports is
awfull too.
Regarding "make index": try "make fetchindex" right after the cvsup.
IT may not be up to the point with the cvsupped stuff, but not far off.
Bye,
Alexander.
I don't think we who use the modular X.org tree can do this since a
number
of the ports won't be properly registered in the file (or am I off-base
here?).
--
Coleman
Heh, that is a serious problem considering that modular Xorg would
probably at max add about 100 ~ 150~some packages to the portage tree,
depending on how things are done.
Yeah, I propose we just stay with X.org 6.9.0.
PS: This is "ports tree" really, not "portage tree".
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
Yes, you're right (about the PS). That was a silly misphrase on my part..
Just curious though: why stay with Xorg 6.9?
-Garrett
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
