The appliance is in a 1U form-factor with just a single riser-based slot (PCIe 2.0).

Thanks for your help with this,

Charles


On 11/15/10 6:14 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
The way you talked about this at first made me think this was something new, but its actually fairly old, its just a quad port 82571, id is 0x10A5, support has been in the drivers for ages :)

The issue is the hardware not the OS or driver, even if the motherboard is PCIE 2.0, does it
not have slots that are 1 ?

For server adapters you might consider going 82576 or 82580.

Jack


On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Charles Owens <cow...@greatbaysoftware.com <mailto:cow...@greatbaysoftware.com>> wrote:

    Well, I believe we have an answer:

    http://www.intel.com/support/network/adapter/pro100/sb/CS-030873.htm

    The motherboard definitely is PCIe 2.0 .   The page suggests these
    cards for use with a PCIe2.0 system:

  # Intel® PRO/1000 PT Quad Port LP Server Adapter (P/N EXPI9404PTL)
  # Intel® Gigabit ET Quad Port Server Adapter (P/N E1G44ET)
  # Intel® Gigabit ET2 Quad Port Server Adapter (P/N E1G44ET2)


    Notably there's not a PF option shown, so we're going to have to
    think about that.   But in any case, do you think these models
    will function with 8.0?  8.0 plus a patch?  .... or is 8.1 the
    only option?

    Thanks,
    Charles


    On 11/15/10 4:58 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
    Well, if the system doesnt show the hardware in a PCI scan there
    isn't much my driver can do :)

    The last line in your log says 'eth0', what's that about?

    You could try booting 8.1 64 bit, you can also send me all the
    details about the board, just to
    make sure I can get the exact one and then I'll try it here. This
    is quad port fiber, right? I was
    thinking this was PCI ID 0x1527, 82580 adapter.  The support is
    in HEAD now.

    Regards,

    Jack


    On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Charles Owens
    <cow...@greatbaysoftware.com
    <mailto:cow...@greatbaysoftware.com>> wrote:

        Jack, I'm afraid that with the card _not_ installed we get
        identical pciconf output.  We're running 32 bit simply
        because that's where we got rolling with our product, and
        have not yet made the call to invest in the effort required
        to make the jump to 64.  Do you think that our being at 32
        bit could be a factor here?

        So far the same card model has been tested on several of
        these server appliances, so I doubt it's a bad-slot situation.

        In case it's helpful, I've attached  a boot log.  Anything
        else that I can provide that might help?

        Thank you,
        Charles



        On 11/15/10 3:23 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:

            UH, did you do that with the adapter in the system?? I do
            not see the ID I
            expected
            to see. Some reason you're running 32 bit??

            Can you run the pciconf with the adapter in and out,
            compare and tell me
            what its
            ID is?  All the unidentified devices I see are in the
            0x3XXX range and those
            are not
            network devices.

            Maybe its a bad slot?

            Jack


            On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Charles
            Owens<cow...@greatbaysoftware.com
            <mailto:cow...@greatbaysoftware.com>

                wrote:
                 Great... thanks!   Please see attached.   BTW, the
                system is running
                8.0-RELEASE-p2 i386 (PAE).


                Charles



                On 11/13/10 2:24 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:

                pciconf -l please, I'll betcha these are the new quad
                ports that are in my
                next igb driver
                update, it would have gone in already but I've been
                fighting a bug in the
                header split
                code.

                Show me what the output looks like, and I'll get ya
                fixed up, dont worry :)

                Jack


                On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Charles Owens<
                cow...@greatbaysoftware.com
                <mailto:cow...@greatbaysoftware.com>>  wrote:

                    Hello,

                    We're trying to work with newly purcharsed Intel
                    EXPi9404PF NICs ("Intel
                    PRO/1000 PF Quad Port Server Adapter") but they
                    do not seem to be detected
                    (no ports showing with 'ifconfig -l').   We're
                    having no problems with the
                    2-port version of the same card -- is there a
                    known issue with the 4-port
                    version?

                    We've tried three different cards of this model,
                    all with same result.
                     Thanks in advance for any help.

                    Charles

                    --
                     Charles Owens
                     Great Bay Software, Inc.



                    _______________________________________________
                    freebsd-net@freebsd.org
                    <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org> mailing list
                    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
                    To unsubscribe, send any mail to
                    "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
                    <mailto:freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org>"


            _______________________________________________
            freebsd-net@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
            mailing list
            http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
            To unsubscribe, send any mail to
            "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
            <mailto:freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org>"




_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to