At 03:06 AM 11/28/2006, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:36:34 -0500
Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> OK, I added OpenBSD to the mix as well.  Results are pretty crappy
> with the base default install. With one stream, the box essentially
> live locks. This was just with the stock kernels from the CD.  The
> PCIe bge nics dont work, so I cant test those.  I had a look at their
> errata page and there seems to be some updates to those 2 nics so if
> there is interest I can try compiling in those fixes and re-testing

FWIW I would definitively like to see it. But thanks for going so far..

I will give it another try tomorrow as I dont have much time today. However, I did one test with a new CPU. I changed the cpu from an AMD 3800 to an AMD4600. So going from a CPU with a clock speed of 2Ghz to 2.4Gz. The difference is sort of what one would expect. In the ipfw tests, (with a sample of 40 seconds) opposite path forwarding with 10 ipfw rules went from 208 Kpps to 235 Kpps or about a 10% increase as opposed to the ~ 15% increase in clock speed. Perhaps bus is more of a limiting factor that CPU but then again some the difference could be explained with normal variance.

---Mike
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to