--On torsdag, torsdag 13 sep 2007 15.07.17 -0400 Francisco Reyes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Palle Girgensohn writes:
Now, I hear rumors that AMD is to be preferred over Intel for
performance
From what I have read in the past, specially in the postgresql list, it
seems the AMD64 cpus do better with Postgresql. Possibly because of
better bus architecture.
I think this is not current information; the new woodcrest architecture
performs mucg better, although this is deduced from this thread's
discussion...
Personally I think having lots of memory and a good disk subsystem is
going to make a bigger difference.
true
What sizes are you expecting for your data?
What type of growth? How many concurrent connections?
Presently ~pgsql/data has a 16 GB footprint. The growth is rather slow,
around a percent per week, sometimes much more due to batch updates. Even
with a high system load, we seldom see more than a 30-40 concurrent
postgresql connections.
/Palle
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
