> Just curious, but are these results obtained while you are > overclocking your 2.4ghz CPU to 3.4ghz? That might be a useful > datapoint.
Yes they are with the CPU overclocked. I have verified the results when not overclocked as well (running at stock). > It also might be useful to know what sort of disks you are using. > SATA is notoriously bad at parallel access, and compiling is of > course horribly disk bound to begin with. I'm sure disk I/O is a factor here. ULE is supposed to provide better interactiveness during high load (and I/O load), right? Perhaps the scheduler is being too liberal with time slices for I/O? Josh _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
