At Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:06:39 -0400, Josh Carroll wrote: > > I decided to do some testing of concurrent processes (rather than a > single process that's multi-threaded). Specifically, I ran 4 ffmpeg > (without the -threads option) commands at the same time. The > difference was less than a percent: > > 4bsd: 439.92 real 1755.91 user 1.08 sys > ule: 442.10 real 1754.65 user 1.34 sys > > The difference in user/sys is slight, but there. Not sure if that's > pertinent, though, given it is such a small percentage. > > I also ran the same scenario with mencoder, with similar results: > > 4bsd: 377.96 real 1501.58 user 2.04 sys > ule: 377.50 real 1501.68 user 1.93 sys > > I think this is important, as it shows an N-process workload on an > N-processor system is the same between ULE and 4BSD, while a single > process (N-threads) workload on an N-processor system seems to favor > 4BSD (at least for media encoding). I'm still unsure why MySQL is so > much better with ULE, given these results. > > Again, hope this information is useful! >
First of all, yes it is and thanks for doing all this. Second, the person who has been working on ULE is moving house so may not respond for a bit, so don't worry, you're work is not being ignored. Best, George _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
