Robert Watson wrote:
I think it's best if participating machines supply data regularly for
an extended period of time. Single or infrequent data points for a
specific configuration don't make much sense. We need to compare
apples to apples.
Yes -- I was mostly thinking about backdating in order to play "catchup"
when a new benchmark is introduced.
One thing I am looking at is how to best create a library of world
tarballs that can be used to populate a nfsroot (or hybrid of periodic
tarballs + binary diffs to save space). Then you could provide your
benchmark in a standardized format (start/end/cleanup scripts, etc) and
tell a machine "go and run this benchmark on every daily snapshot for
the last year and give me the numbers".
Kris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
