Mark, Thanks
We have same RAID setting both on FreeBSD and CentOS including cache setting. In FreeBSD, I enabled the write cache but the performance is the same. We don’t use ZFS or UFS, and test the performance on the RAW GEOM disk “mfidx” exported by mfi driver. We observed the “gstat” result and found that the write latency is too high. When we “dd" the disk with 8k, it is lower than 1ms, but it is 6ms on 64kb write. It seems that each single write operation is very slow. But I don’t know whether it is a driver problem or not. Jason > 在 2016年6月22日，上午12:36，Mark Felder <f...@freebsd.org> 写道： > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016, at 02:17, Jason Zhang wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am working on storage service based on FreeBSD. I look forward to a >> good result because many professional storage company use FreeBSD as its >> OS. But I am disappointed with the Bad performance. I tested the the >> performance of LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i and had the following bad result: >> >> 1. Test environment: >> (1) OS: FreeBSD 10.0 release > > 10.0-RELEASE is no longer supported. Can you test this on 10.3-RELEASE? > > Have you confirmed that both servers are using identical RAID controller > settings? It's possible the CentOS install has enabled write caching but > it's disabled on your FreeBSD server. Are you using UFS or ZFS on > FreeBSD? Do you have atime enabled? I believe CentOS is going to have > "relatime" or "nodiratime" by default to mitigate the write penalty on > each read access. > > We need more data :-) > > > -- > Mark Felder > ports-secteam member > f...@freebsd.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
