On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 11:23:37 +1000
Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-Sep-12 22:00:49 -0300, "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >I think www/nspluginwrapper is the best choice these days, since
> >linuxpluginwrapper seems to be an abandoned project.
> Unfortunately, nspluginwrapper is not a general replacement for
> linuxpluginwrapper - it is missing most of linuxpluginwrapper's
Recentry, wine is good solution for using Flash.
> functionality. nork@ also appears to be MIA - he hasn't responded to
> any of the other threads on linuxpluginwrapper being broken. For my
> specific requirements (running pips), I managed to hack a work-around
> but I don't believe it's committable.
I don't have any idea to fix LPW.
1. Because linux-flash is too unstable, so I don't know weither
LPW is wrong or linux-flash is wrong.
2. By multiple weak symbols solution issue(undefined/unstable
resolve weak symbols), I can't hook some important functions
like dl*(4). I'm thinking merging to libc to fix, but I don't
have any evidence that it's true. This issue is critical by
ELF Symbol Versioning.
3. I think that LPW's solution is quite good solution, but it's
too hard solution:-). Maybe, all glibc functions should be
hooked, and hack for some macros like getc:-(.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
