Jerry writes: > > Ha, i've submitted mine about two months ago and still no luck. > > Personally, I believe that the current system, if not partially > broken, is far from ideal. I would prefer to see a system where > each submitted PR is assigned a specific number (I believe it is > actually) and then assigned in numeric order to the next > available committer.
Not all committers are created equal. Asking Joe-the-fonts- guru to work on Mary's network monitoring application is probably not productive. Keeping a centralized list of who/what pairs - more importantly, keeping it useful - is another job on someone's desk. Are you that someone? > I am sure that the old, "But they are all volunteers", or some > such tirade will erupt. Not a tirade, but ... guilty. > It must be remembered that those who submit items for approval > are also volunteers. They deserve at least as much respect as > those who are actively working on those submitted items. Am I correct you are asking for a (far) higher level of dedication from the committers than from those who submit changes? Consider the port that goes untouched (in spite of substantial upstream changes) for months or even years; someone picks up the torch, and the poor committer gets N-thousend lines of new features, security patches, and dependency changes dumped on them to be checked in ... how long was that? Do I think there are flaws in the current system? Sure. But as long as we're faced with this particular choice of evils - slow updating versus lowered quality - I vote "first, do no harm". Respectfully, Robert Huff _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"