Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 08.09.2011 13:52, schrieb Matt Burke:
> > I want machines, tools, to do as *I* say not the other way round, whether > > it's good for me or not. If I wanted nannying and interference, I'd install > > Ubuntu. > > No, you'd use a managed installation. Nobody stands there pointing a > gun at your head and forces you to uninstall a port that got removed > from the ports/ tree. If people could recognize that, it might help get > the derailed discussion back on the right track. Recent butchery degrading ports/ has been unprofessional. Denying users are best to decide for themselves in light of their own circustance, is not acceptable. FreeBSD is for skilled Users not the clueless. Commit bit[s] should be revoked before FreeBSD incures more damage. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below, not above; Indent with "> "; Cumulative like a play script. Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. http://www.softwarefreedomday.org 17th Sept, http://berklix.org/sfd/ Oct. _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
