On 29/09/2015 21:34, Mel Pilgrim wrote:
> The ports system was changed to make mandatory a version of pkg that was
> not available by the default method.  That's a POLA violation, but it
> appears no one wants to talk about it.

To turn that around, why are you mixing pkgs from a quarterly branch
with ports compiled from head?  If you use ports/pkgs from a consistent
source then you won't suffer from this problem.

        Matthew


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to