On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 4:10 PM, William A. Mahaffey III <w...@hiwaay.net> wrote:
> On 04/10/16 18:09, Peter Jeremy wrote: > >> On 2016-Apr-10 17:09:04 -0453, "William A. Mahaffey III" <w...@hiwaay.net> >> wrote: >> >>> configure process completed OK, but created a Makefile w/ what seems to >>> be a bunch of linuxisms in conditionals to allow compilation for >>> different architectures, see attached orig-Makefile. >>> >> Have you tried using gmake, rather than the base make? >> >> > > Hmmmm .... No, I didn't :-/ .... Did I mention pilot error ? I thought the > system make was a version of gmake, but apparently not, right ? Thanks, > I'll try that & see how it goes .... > > -- > > William A. Mahaffey III > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war > ever devised by man." > -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. > > _______________________________________________ > > FreeBSD make and GNU make are different species ( means not compatible ) . If you compare building of GCC in FreeBSD and Linux , you may model building of Open64 in FreeBSD with respect to building in Linux . If I were you , I would not work on Open64 because GCC is much better than Open64 with respect to my opinion . In Linux , I have checked Open64 for using it , but I have abandoned that idea , because at least it does not have 128 bit floating point numbers ( if it is not included yet ) . It may be said that it is abandoned : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open64 http://developer.amd.com/tools-and-sdks/cpu-development/x86-open64-compiler-suite/ https://sourceforge.net/projects/open64/ https://sourceforge.net/projects/open64/files/open64/ https://sourceforge.net/projects/open64/files/open64/Open64-5.0/ http://www.open64.net/ Mehmet Erol Sanliturk _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"