On Wednesday 12 February 2003 11:22, Daniel Bye wrote: > I have just tried to resolve doubleclick.net, and the first hit took > around three seconds. Thereafter, with it cachedi locally, it came back > in at most 0.02 seconds. I reckon your best bet is to persevere - does > the cache demonstrate any advantage at all?
No advantage at all. What do you mean by "persevere"? > I put my upstream (ISP's) caches in the forwarders section in named.conf. > While not strictly necessary, as already pointed out, it can give you the > advantage of tapping into a huge set of cached data on your ISP's servers. > Suck it and see - I cannot believe that you are the only person connecting > through your ISP who gets pelted with these bloody ads from doubleclick. Have added them, without seeing any difference in performance. But it does make my tcpdump more readable. > Check for messages in /var/log/messages, or whatever file your named > logs to. /var/log/messages reports nothing unusual. Haven't told named to log somewhere else. Bjarne -- Homepage: http://www.mekanix.dk To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
